On Tuesday 15 July 2008 09:00:41 pm Alex Samad wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:17:55AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 05:35:55PM -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote: > > > On Monday 14 July 2008 05:26:14 pm Alex Samad wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02:59:00PM -0400, Damon L. Chesser wrote: > > > > > On Monday 14 July 2008 02:47:06 pm Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 08:02:05AM +1000, Alex Samad wrote: > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have noticed that openjdk has made it into the repo's. > > > > > > > Wondering what people thoughts where on > > > > > > > > > > > > > > openjdk, gij and gcj ? > > > > ... > > > > > > I haven't used openjdk and I used gcj a while back (its installed but > > > > I default to the sun implementation) there is also the ibm version > > > > and bea's versions > > > > with sun-java fully open now, it will be interesting to watch what > > happens. Will gcj continue, pulling code from sun-java, or will the > > gcj people accept sun-java and allow gcj to just die. > > > > A > > I think you are mixing up gij and java - both virtual machines. gcj > takes java and produces executables - compiles to native code.
LOL, yes, I am sure I am. The entire Linux Java thing confuses me, it goes back to the bad old Blackdown days. I never could figure out what I wanted. -- Damon L. Chesser [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linkedin.com/in/dchesser
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
