Apology for this question. Supposed there is a large organization where ''/usr/local'' is reserved for the real local of any system.
Supposed HQ introduced package ''hq-vi'' which is a modification of vim. But, a branch also introduced ''branch-hq-vi'' which is a different modification of vim too. (1) Is it OK to name the packages with ''hq-vi'' and ''branch-hq-vi'' without reporting to any upstream (whatever that is)? (2) Is it OK to put those packages into /usr/bin? Is /opt a better place? Eg. /opt/hq/ and /opt/hg/branch/? (3) Is it OK to use the /etc/alternatives directory for altering the vi? (4) Any suggestion? -- Raja Ali M.I. Ilias, Bengkalis, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AliMilis Counted GNU/Linux Engineer # 405138 - http://counter.li.org/ Ubuntu User # 14458 - http://ubuntucounter.geekosophical.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
