On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:36:28PM -0400, Sridhar Srinivasan wrote: > what is the output of locale -a ? i have a similar problem, wherein i > have added new locales but they don't show up using locale -a. i > posted a message about this a few days ago and was told that there is > a bug in glibc 2.3.1. perhaps that is what is affecting you as well.
No, you were told that glibc 2.3.2 would enhance locale reporting to deal with the use of locale-archive files, rather than having to use a separate command to see the contents of those, which is hardly the same thing. You were ALSO told how to retrieve the true and accurate list of locales defined on the box, and yet you tell someone to use 'locale -a' knowing that it does not provide that information. Interesting. For your future reference: rei $ locale -a C POSIX rei $ localedef --list-archive en_US en_US.iso88591 en_US.iso885915 en_US.utf8 ja_JP ja_JP.eucjp ja_JP.ujis ja_JP.utf8 japanese japanese.euc Remember now? -- Marc Wilson | Look before you leap. -- Samuel Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
