On 07 Jul 2008, Mumia W.. wrote: > On 07/07/2008 04:12 AM, Anthony Campbell wrote: >> On 07 Jul 2008, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: >>> [ good advice snipped ] >> >> It didn't work here. I did the same thing and the appropriate stuff in >> /usr/local but I still can't print. Did you do something to make FF see >> the gtk-2.10 stuff? >> >> Anthony >> > > > I did. I installed gtk+2.10 to a non-standard location to prevent it > from conflicting with gtk+2.8. I suggest you place something like > gtk+2.10 in a new directory, e.g. /usr/local/exotic; when you install, > you'll get a /usr/local/exotic/lib directory containing the library > binaries. > > I also created a startup script for firefox that sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH to > the 'lib' directory where gtk+2.10's binaries are installed, e.g.: > > #!/bin/sh > #---------firefox-3.0.sh------------- > export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/exotic/lib > exec /usr/local/firefox-3.0/firefox
Doesn't seem to help here. I don't have any "lib" directory in gtk-2.10; just engines, immodules, printbackends, and loaders. Perhaps I should have used an earlier version of gtk-2.10? Anthony -- Anthony Campbell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microsoft-free zone - Using Debian GNU/Linux http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews, and sceptical articles) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
