On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 05:21:24PM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote: > 2008/6/27 Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > ... > > > The trouble here seems to be, at least in part, that Adobe feels at liberty > to extend the PDF spec without caring about users with non-Adobe readers. > Adobe probably won't alter its approach unless it feels a significant > community backlash is brewing. > > Another problem is that there is an increasing number of programs with PDF > output that are not strict about even some fairly well-established parts of > the spec. The developers of these programs probably test the output only in > Acrord32, if they test it at all. That's like declaring a web site > well-coded if it looks okay in IE. > > I'm not sure what to do about either of these problems, except to suggest > greater community investment in cross-platform FLOSS PDF readers, writers, > validators and plug-ins. > I would really appreciate a website that outlined these issues that I could direct ppl too, after they send me content that is not readable.
Would you object to me using the list archives? > Sam -- /**************************************************************** * Mike Mestnik: Junior Admin 612-395-8932 * * [EMAIL PROTECTED] VISI * ****************************************************************/ Alt address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
