Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 17:56:24 -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 16:38:13 -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 15:01:49 -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 14:02:44 -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
[...]
Thank you very much for the advice. However, I am still
having the same problem: 'aptitude remove --purge <package>'
does not fix the problem. The problem with the unmet
dependencies
libstlport4.6c2
libservlet2.3-java
libxt-java
libmdbtools
libportaudio0
[...]
Hi! follows a copy of my /etc/apt/sources.list file. Just in case, I
am using the amd64 port of etch...
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian etch main contrib non-free
That should work; this mirror has the .deb file right here:
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/stlport4.6/libstlport4.6c2_4.6.2-3_amd64.deb
What happens if you run "aptitude update"? Are there any error messages?
Here it is, no error messages:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo aptitude update
[ lines not pertaining to http.us.debian.org removed ]
Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org etch Release.gpg [378B]
Hit http://http.us.debian.org etch Release
Ign http://http.us.debian.org etch/main Packages/DiffIndex
Ign http://http.us.debian.org etch/contrib Packages/DiffIndex
Ign http://http.us.debian.org etch/non-free Packages/DiffIndex
Hit http://http.us.debian.org etch/main Packages
Hit http://http.us.debian.org etch/contrib Packages
Hit http://http.us.debian.org etch/non-free Packages
That does look OK indeed. Do you now see the package available with
"apt-cache policy libstlport4.6c2"?
Hi Florian,
here is the output. The package is still missing:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache policy libstlport4.6c2
libstlport4.6c2:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: (none)
Version table:
4.6.2-3 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
What about installing libstlport4.6c2 by hand? downloading the .deb file
and using dpkg -i? of course, I will have to care about dependences by
hand too. Does this make sense?
I use synaptic for installing packages. Yesterday, when I ran synaptic,
it complained about a dependence problem, asking to use "Fix broken
packages" before installing anything. After that, the problem with the
installation of openoffice begun. May be both things are related? I
don't know...
thanks a lot for your time!
--
Marcelo Chiapparini
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
