On Tuesday 06 May 2008 05:11:38 am Michelle Konzack wrote: > Am 2008-05-04 12:36:10, schrieb Paul Johnson: > > On Saturday 03 May 2008 11:38:59 pm NN_il_Confusionario wrote: > > > On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 11:14:53AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > > On Saturday 03 May 2008 02:17:30 am LÉVAI Dániel wrote: > > > > > Currently, I'm thinking of Samba, > > > > > because the win clients can only use that; is this correct? > > > > > > > > Why not use something real on the clients? > > > > > > What does it mean "something real" ? > > > > Why not use something other than Windows on the clients? > > Because some enterprise NEED propretary software which do not exist > under Linux? And they even can not update to "Micro$oft Winsuck Fiasco > Ultimate"(tm) since new licenses cost over 5000 Euro per workplace?
That's what wine is for. These days you have to go out of your way to find software that won't run in wine. -- Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Explaination of .pgp part: http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Mail/rant-gpg.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
