Am Mittwoch, 23. April 2008 schrieb Julien BLACHE:
> Johannes Meixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> umax1220u scripts are started in a sequence (i.e. not in parallel, when
> >> one is completed the next one starts).
>
> When troubleshooting udev rules, use udevmonitor to actually see
> what's happening in terms of udev events and their properties.
>
That was a very good hint, thanks. A single scanimage -L causes these events:
UEVENT[1208979136.171525] remove /class/usb_endpoint/usbdev1.5_ep01
(usb_endpoint)
UEVENT[1208979136.171696] remove /class/usb_endpoint/usbdev1.5_ep82
(usb_endpoint)
UEVENT[1208979136.171702] remove /class/usb_endpoint/usbdev1.5_ep83
(usb_endpoint)
UEVENT[1208979136.171707] add /class/usb_endpoint/usbdev1.5_ep01
(usb_endpoint)
UEVENT[1208979136.171712] add /class/usb_endpoint/usbdev1.5_ep82
(usb_endpoint)
UEVENT[1208979136.171717] add /class/usb_endpoint/usbdev1.5_ep83
(usb_endpoint)
UDEV [1208979136.172276] remove /class/usb_endpoint/usbdev1.5_ep01
(usb_endpoint)
UDEV [1208979136.172803] remove /class/usb_endpoint/usbdev1.5_ep82
(usb_endpoint)
UDEV [1208979136.173239] remove /class/usb_endpoint/usbdev1.5_ep83
(usb_endpoint)
UDEV [1208979136.174020] add /class/usb_endpoint/usbdev1.5_ep01
(usb_endpoint)
UDEV [1208979136.174831] add /class/usb_endpoint/usbdev1.5_ep82
(usb_endpoint)
UDEV [1208979136.175619] add /class/usb_endpoint/usbdev1.5_ep83
(usb_endpoint)
>
> > ACTION!="add", GOTO="end"
> > SYSFS{idVendor}=="04b8", SYSFS{idProduct}=="010b", RUN+="..."
> > LABEL="end"
>
> Be careful with the labels you use. Always use a unique label name, or
> you're asking for troubles. (been there, done that, accidentally
> rendered a number of systems unbootable due to that ...)
I tried that before after I saw the z60_libsane.rules
ACTION!="add", GOTO="post_lamp_off"
SYSFS{idVendor}=="1606", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0010", MODE="0664",
GROUP="scanner", NAME="umax%n", RUN+="/usr/local/bin/umax1220u start",
ENV{lamp_off}="yes"
LABEL="post_lamp_off"
But given the events, it is obvious not surprising that this is not working.
> > Welcome in the hell of udev, HAL and whatever else sophisticated
> > stuff which is required to make users happy or so they say...
>
> <aol />
I added now in my script a file system lock:
if [ ! -e /tmp/umax1220u-plugged ]; then
touch /tmp/umax1220u-plugged
Is anybody aware of a more elegant solution for this problem?
Thanks,
Rainer
--
Rainer Dorsch
Lärchenstr. 6
D-72135 Dettenhausen
07157-734133
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E
Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/
