Steve Lamb: > > Not to mention mutt's IMAP implementation is less than stellar. > [...]
I have read statements to that effect several times now but I don't
really know where the problem lies. I know that mutt is mainly
unmaintained now and that there are unfixed bugs (like the wrong
reporting of unread mails per IMAP-mailbox). But are there general
problems with the code like maintainability, incompatibilities or errors
in the implementation of the IMAP protocol?
J
--
There is no justice in road accidents.
[Agree] [Disagree]
<http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
