On 04/02/2008, BartlebyScrivener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 3, 12:00 pm, "Dotan Cohen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Sounds great, but the only thing that really makes me interested is > > the full keyboard control, > > > Which necessarily involves all of the advantages of using vim and all > of the programmable aspects of Mutt. > > I used T-bird for years. Also used OOwriter and Word for years. But > Vim (or Emacs, or whatever text editor you like) is a hundred times > faster and more efficient than a point-and-click word processor, > right? >
Sure, for plain text OOo and Word are terrible tools. They are not meant for that purpose. However, when you need markup such as that for print documents, a word processor is a necessity. > Same goes for Mutt vs. T-bird. Faster, totally programmable, and you > get to compose emails in your favorite text editor. > Dotan Cohen http://what-is-what.com http://gibberish.co.il א-ב-ג-ד-ה-ו-ז-ח-ט-י-ך-כ-ל-ם-מ-ן-נ-ס-ע-ף-פ-ץ-צ-ק-ר-ש-ת A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
