On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 12:55:37PM -0400, Sridhar Srinivasan wrote: > On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 08:44:07AM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 10:52:26AM -0400, Sridhar Srinivasan wrote: > > > can anyone tell me what i'm doing wrong? > > > > Sure. You're not reading bug #166979. The locale command doesn't know > > anything about locale-archive files, and that's what gets created by > > default these days. > > > > To get a true picture of what locales you have built, use both 'locale -a' > > and 'localedef --list-archive'. > > > > Supposedly glibc 2.3.2 enhances the locale binary. > > thanks for the info. so i guess i will have to try to upgrade my glibc > as i'm currently at 2.3.1 but it doesn't show up on dselect, any > suggestions?
Wait a little until 2.3.2 arrives in unstable. If you aren't already an expert, don't try to upgrade glibc by hand. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
