s. keeling wrote:
David Dyer-Bennet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
s. keeling wrote:
I've never run across a CD I couldn't still read, and I've a few
old ones. DVD, I would expect to be even better. For me, tape's
Why would you expect DVD to be better? I'd expect it to be worse, for
the obvious reasons -- smaller physical bit representations, packed
Because it's newer technology which ought to have incorporated lessons
learned from the CD history. Perhaps that's wishful thinking.
Ah; well, perhaps it is, but it's not *crazy* I don't think, either.
I feel like it's not really "new" tech, since it's so very similar to
CD-R. To me it feels like old tech pushed very hard to achieve the much
higher densities. The disk layering and the dyes are to the best of my
knowledge *very* similar.
--
David Dyer-Bennet, [EMAIL PROTECTED]; http://dd-b.net/
Snapshots: http://dd-b.net/dd-b/SnapshotAlbum/data/
Photos: http://dd-b.net/photography/gallery/
Dragaera: http://dragaera.info
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
