On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 09:23:59PM +0200, David Fokkema wrote: > On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 10:13:37AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > On Sat, 2 Aug 2003 11:14:27 +0200, David Fokkema <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > I'm sorry you have objections to C-R systems. But hey, it's your > > > right to have them. Furthermore, I'm sorry to have bothered you to > > > the point you found it necessary to reply to me. > > > > I am not bothered. I merely wanted you to be aware that your > > system has false positives; but it is your decision. > > I'm using SA. It's just that I don't mind C-R and like the general > concept, but I see many people who's opinions I value and who's mails > I'd rather not send to /dev/null would not respond to a challenge, > either out of principle, annoyance or feasibility. > > Oh well, I'll stick to filtering... > > (anyone knows of a trick to automatically whitelist all correspondents > on debian-user? ;-)
Not in any detail I don't, but if there are scripts for automatically whitelisting addresses based on other criteria, you could presumably modify one of them so it reads something like: if X-mailing-list == [EMAIL PROTECTED] then extract "From" address and whitelist it. -- ,-------------------------------------------------------------------------. > -ScruLoose- | I care less and less what people think. < > Please do not | - Ani DiFranco < > reply off-list. | < `-------------------------------------------------------------------------'
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
