On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 08:03:42PM -0400, Celejar wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:13:23 -0500 > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 10:06:59 -0700, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > said: > > > > > I'd say the main difference is that apt-get is a command-line tool, > > > whereas aptitude is an interactive tool that can be driven from the > > > command-line. > > > > Are there still command line usages of apt-get that are not > > exactly the same in aptitude? And has apt-get started keeping track of > > The classic examples that arise periodically on the list are apt-get's > 'build-dep' and 'source' actions, which apparently have no obvious > aptitude versions.
this bothers me, since I mostly use aptitude. When I need a build-dep or source, I'm concerned that later aptitude may wipe something inadvertantly. Do you know if there are plans to implement these commands into aptitude? Or will apt-get always remain, so that its not a problem? A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
