On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 09:34:47PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 08:13:54AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:51:21PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > > > Miles Bader wrote: > > > > I expect that google is somewhat chary about adding more buttons to > > > > their UI (look how long it took them to add a "delete" button!), > > > > especially one as potentially confusing as reply-to-list-only. The > > > > current reply-to-all is much safer. > > > > > > Which is the exact reason why reply-to-list has been an open bug for = > > > TB! > > > for going on 4-5 years now. They don't want to add another button and ca= > > > n't > > > agree on what the default behavior should be or if they should have a dro= > > > pdown > > > menu like 1/2 the other buttons. *sigh* > > > > I started a small mailing list for some old buddies and I to use as we > > plan our camping trip for next year. Its something we do every 4 years > > or so and it generates all kinds of mail in the process. I thought a > > list would be a great way to manage that stuff. > > Yep, same for me
what were you using? > > And because of that I opted for the "groups" feature of one big free > mail provider. It comes will all the "bells and whistles", like subject > tagging and reply-to munging. Yuck! I thought of that, but it was just so easy to set-up and I even ended up just manually signing up my friends (minimalist here, just a flat text list of the subscribers). I've also avoided reply-to munging, but I may just do it so I can stop reposting stuff to the list. A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
