On Wed, 2007.09.26 12:52, Mike McCarty wrote: > Fedora I would not recommend to anyone not interested in > eternally fiddling with the machine, broken interfaces, > and churn. It's for people whose hobbies include fiddling > with new installs and reloading. > > I'm not into that, either, for these large machines. > When I finally upgrade to another release, it won't be > FC. > > The reason _I_ installed FC was that I got an employment > contract, and was requested to build up a machine which > could dual boot WinXP and FC for test on multiple platforms. > Due to inertia and general laziness, I have not moved from > FC2, which in FC terms is REALLY ANCIENT. > > I don't like it, but I also don't like reloading. :-)
I started using Linux with FC2 (or FC3 maybe) and was just thrilled with it (with Linux, really). Then I got annoyed with FC's bleeding edge software and also decided that I shouldn't have to reinstall every 6 months in order to stay current. That's when I started using Debian (and was thrilled all over again). Now reinstalling is unnecessary and I can get as close to the bleeding edge as I want by using whichever distribution (stable, testing, or unstable).
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
