On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:03:47PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 06:40:58PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote: > > On Monday 24 September 2007 15:50:58 Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 03:36:45PM -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote: > > > > > SA should log to /var/log/mail.info, and that's a good place to look > > > for info... > > > > I have two spamd entries in mail.info: > > > > Sep 24 14:51:09 etch spamd[10151]: spamd: connection from localhost > > [127.0.0.1] at port 43270 > > Sep 24 14:51:11 etch spamd[10151]: spamd: bad protocol: header error: > > at /usr/sbin/spamd line 1671, <GEN4> line 1. > > Sep 24 14:51:12 etch spamd[10150]: prefork: child states: II > > > > and > > > > Sep 24 15:26:20 etch spamd[10151]: spamd: connection from localhost > > [127.0.0.1] at port 60337 > > Sep 24 15:26:26 etch spamd[10151]: spamd: bad protocol: header error: ÿôÿý_ > > at /usr/sbin/spamd line 1671, <GEN5> line 1. > > Sep 24 15:26:26 etch spamd[10150]: prefork: child states: II > > > > If I'm interpreting this correctly, this was a couple of malformed messages > > which caused spamd to choke. Apparently, then, spamd is being called and > > passed the messages for examination. > > huh. I get copious output from spamd with every mail that hits it. How > are you starting spamd? > > ps aux | grep spamd | grep -v grep I might not be able to add much to the exim discussion but you can do
ps aux | grep [s]pamd > > ... > > > > > I had that backwards. I thought nobody:true meant to only perform the > > actions > > below when the check WAS true. So the colon signifies an OR, not an IF. > > essentially. > > ... > > > > I've reconfigured the file with your recommendations and restarted exim. > > I'm > > still not getting any headers in any email, including obvious spam. Not > > sure > > what's going on. Do you know of any way to verify that ACLs are actually > > running? > > I really don't know other than to see them show up in the logs > etc. Can you provide the pertinent part of exim4.conf? the entire ACL > section would be good. > > A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
