On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 11:14:57 -0400, Douglas A Tutty
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On small systems, what about the penalty of just larger binaries? I
> have some older boxes with 16-64 MB ram.
Firstly: Very few packages have been actively patched to link
with selinux. Second, the selinux libraries are shared libs -- so the
actual binary is not significantly increased in size (well, dpkg is the
exception, since it is linked statically with selinux).
My Pentium II box with 64MB of ram seems to run in SELinux
strict mode just fine -- it is my firewall.
manoj
--
Lord, what fools these mortals be! William Shakespeare, "A
Midsummer-Night's Dream"
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
