On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 00:46:49 +0200, Davide Mancusi wrote: > Florian Kulzer ha scritto: >> I would log out and check if the second Xorg process is still there, to >> see if the problem is tied to your account or not. > > Still there. > >> Then I would temporarily switch to xdm or gdm and check if the anomaly >> is still occurring. This will hopefully tell us if we have to start >> poking around in the kdm configuration or in the configuration files of >> X itself. > > > > /var/log/kdm.log might also be worth a look. > > I tried with gdm and I got the same result. I turned then to the kdm log > file and to xorg.conf. The only interesting line in kdm.log was the > following: > > (WW) fglrx: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:1:0:1) found > > ...which reminds me that my video card has an unused exit port (a DVI port? > I can't remember). Could this be the reason? It sounds a bit silly to have > an X server running if nothing is connected to the DVI port, but who > knows... How can I test this hypothesis?
I don't think that this is related to the two Xorg processes. I see the same warning with my Intel Q965 graphics card, simply because it shows up under two bus addresses in lspci, but I don't have two Xorg processes running. Maybe the full Xorg log (/var/log/Xorg.0.log) has more clues. Maybe the fglrx driver is to blame; did you already check if you still see two Xorg processes with the basic "vesa" driver enabled instead? -- Regards, | http://users.icfo.es/Florian.Kulzer Florian | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
