On 2007-08-27 13:15:01 +0000, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: > Considering that this is exactly what latex was designed for, I would > use latex. AFAIK, docbook is designed for creating manuals that can be > turned into ps, pdf, text, or html without using external packages or > requiring a huge meta-package install. Since there are readily > available (as debian packages) ways to turn latex into html, I use latex > for everything.
All of them I tried produce bad HTML. Conversely, you can convert DocBook into LaTeX with dblatex (the description claims that MathML 2.0 markups are supported). > Also, there's the visual quality of the output. I don't think there's > anything that produces nicer output than Tex. The solution is to convert DocBook files into LaTeX first. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
