On 2007-08-05 23:01:24 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 08/05/07 20:33, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2007-08-05 17:46:41 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > >> python-apt broke, and was fixed soon after. Unless you are running > >> Stable, you are supposed to tolerate this kind of activity. > > > > These kinds of answers really become annoying. > > The truth sometimes is. You *really* ought to read the Unstable FAQ. > > http://wooledge.org/~greg/sidfaq.html > > Especially question #5. > > http://wooledge.org/~greg/sidfaq.html#5
Please, could you make constructive answers? I know that things can break. But they are ways to work around them (have you heard of fault tolerance?). I've reported the problem. The bug was tagged as wontfix because the maintainer of the package doesn't care that things can break in other packages and prefers to return with an exit status of 0 even if the program failed (which is against what an exit status is meant for). > How diligently did you look for a better solution? What were your > results? Telling us that in your OP, along with bug #435674 tells > us that you are serious instead of a whiney Windows escapee. You are getting ridiculous. FYI, I don't use Windows and have never used Windows. If you don't have constructive remarks, please shut up. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
