On Jul 11, 2007, at 2:38 PM, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:08:04PM +0100, andy baxter wrote:
Incidentally, it would help me at least if the list software could
set
the 'reply-to' header to the list address.
Please. Not this argument again.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful
I think the arguments there make sense.
I think people who decry reply-to-munging forfeit their right to
complain when people reply directly instead of to the list, though. ;)
