On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 02:00:11PM +1000, Alex Samad wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:18:43PM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote: > > OpenWRT being the more "open" of the options, is a good place to > > start, but might be a bit more "manual" than you want to set things up. > I have been using openWRT for over 2 years and I have had not problems, my > setup includes 2 uplinks and load balancing between the 2. > > They have 2 version 2.4 stream which they have come to end on and 2.6 there > new > release. > > Check out their wiki, it will have a table of hardware that work.
I have been using OpenWRT also, and I think it's great. The package management system is very flexible, and the software is *very* stable. I tried the other Linux-on-router distros and none seemed to be as polished, robust and flexible as OpenWRT. Please check the webif^2 web interface also (http://www.x-wrt.org/). J. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
