On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 07:51:58PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.07.10.1908 +0200]: > > which is sort of vague. the examples further down the manpage do > > not make use of level= at all to provide a reference. > > Yes, I saw this. > > > I think the two items taken together rather strongly imply that if > > one uses the level= option in mdadm.conf that the 'raid' is not > > required. I think it also implies that sourcing the level= option > > in mdadm.conf as a way to determine the required modules for the > > initramfs may not be valid, but my bash-foo is not up to snuff and > > I can't really tell what hooks/mdadm does in anything more than > > a general way. There may be no other good way to tell which > > modules are needed and just cramming all of them in the image is > > obviously a less-than-ideal solution. > > Good point. Could I convince you to create a bug report against > mdadm so that I can address this in future uploads?
consider it done. A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
