On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 10:18:05AM +0530, Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> On 6/10/07, Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 11:20:04AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> On 06/10/07 10:43, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> >> >On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 08:51:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> >>On 06/10/07 08:23, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> >> >>>Currently 'apt-get upgrade' wants to upgrade 289 packages. Rather
> >> >>>than do them all at once, I like to do smaller groups packages.
> >> >>It will save you time by running "# apt-get -d -y upgrade" while you
> >> >>go eat breakfast. Once all the packages are downloaded, run "#apt-get
> >> >>upgrade" interactively.
> >> >
> >> >The -d option is a good idea but my main question still has not been
> >> >answered. What wants to *remove* gcc and why?
> >>
> >> If this were happening to me, and I *really* cared, I'd use a binary
> >> search algorithm to narrow it down.
> >
> >Huh? Every individual package I've tried to upgrade wants to remove gcc
> >yet the whole collection does not.
> >
>
> You might notice that upgrading everything also includes an upgrade for
> gcc...
It's really amazing that you claim to be able to see my screen better
than I can.
If such were the case I *would* have noticed it and would not have asked
the question.
You would do much better to post from *knowledge* than stupid speculation.
--
"In the U.S. you have to be a deviant or exist in extreme boredom...
Make no mistake; all intellectuals are deviants in the U.S."
-- William Burroughs
Rick Pasotto [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.niof.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
