On 5/10/07, Alex Samad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:34:41AM +0200, Martin Marcher wrote:
> The solution is in the options pam stack uses:
>
> /etc/pam.d/common-password:
> password sufficient pam_ldap.so ignore_unknown_user
> password required pam_unix.so try_first_pass nullok obscure min=4 max=8
> md5
mine looks like
password sufficient pam_unix2.so nullok call_modules=ldap
password required pam_ldap.so try_first_pass md5
he, so you did it just the other way around. Did you modify the
pam.d/other to have a default deny policy because (pam_deny or
whatever). Because I'm thinking about it but on the other hand it's
just too convenient to have a default config that will allow new
services...
--
Martin Marcher
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.mycorners.com
https://www.xing.com/profile/Martin_Marcher
http://www.linkedin.com/in/martinmarcher
http://www.studivz.net/profile.php?ids=9f83ea8c5996b8ec
http://www.amazon.de/gp/registry/wishlist/3KDAGCL2NKOIM/ref=reg_hu-wl_goto-registry/302-4432803-5146435?ie=UTF8&sort=date-added
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
