On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 04:25:34PM +0200, Johannes Wiedersich wrote: > Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:39:06PM +0200, Joe Hart wrote: > >> That type of law is one reason. Iraq and general foreign policy is > >> another. > >> > > See, I thought the main reason that many Europeans were opposed to US > > involvement in Iraq was because they were illegally profiting in Iraq in > > violation of the UN sanctions. > > Maybe it's true that you thought that, but besides that your statement > is plainly wrong. Most Europeans *are* opposed to the US involvement in > Iraq, because it is neither right legally nor morally. Their number is > increasing, because the mission failed and fails besides throwing Saddam > out of office. > Really? What about the stack of UN resolutions promising military action if Saddam did not comply? Were those illegal too?
Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
