On Sat, 2007-04-14 at 19:50 +0200, Joe Hart wrote: > Rick Thomas wrote: > > On Apr 14, 2007, at 6:39 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 11:21:56PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: > >>> Anybody know what the problem is here? Or how to fix it? > >> > >>> W: GPG error: http://volatile.debian.org etch/volatile Release: The > >>> following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is > >>> not available: NO_PUBKEY EC61E0B0BBE55AB3 > >>> W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems > >> > >> You need to import the public key for volatile.debian.org separately > >> using > >> apt-key if you want to use this repo with secure apt, the key is not > >> included in the default debian-archive-keyring package. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Two questions: > > > > 1) How do I import the public key for volatile? (If it's in the fine > > manual, then please point me to it so I can RTFM) > > > > 2) What's the reasoning behind not including it in the default > > debian-archive-keyring package? Is it not recommended that everyone use > > volatile for the things like security and spam updates that it provides? > > 1) Rick, read the message Kushal Kumaran sent to you. It tells you. > > 2) That is a good question. I have no idea. Oversight perhaps? I am > sure if it wasn't there is a good reason for it, but I have no idea what > it could be.
Let me ask you this Joe. Would you have the key for Debian-Multimedia in the "Debian Archive Keyring"? Being a Debian associated, but not really an Official Debian repository. The same goes for volatile. Until they become FULL ON FRIENDSHIP Debian repositories, I don't think it'll get into the "debian-archive-keyring" -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at the playfield. -- Thane Walkup
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
