Am 2007-03-20 07:35:12, schrieb Carl Fink: > Didn't require as much inside knowledge to use with my hardware. (I could > have installed Stable, then used backports.org and apt-get.org to get 95% of > the software I needed, then compiled the rest, but it was all there in > CentOS. Yes, Debian has more total, but not more of what I needed that > particular quarter.)
I like to know, WHAT SOFTWARE you need and its VERSIONS.
I run very new software on my (heavy) Servers but I do not need
more then 5% of backported or selfcompuled/packed software.
> Also, some of the stuff I needed to support wanted Red Hat as its OS, and
Which does not mean, the software YOU NEED is newer!
All you need is a STUPID RedHat support for some software.
Which mean in general older libs and such where RedHat give
a waranty the some software work properly...
> despite the LSB would not have worked on Debian without tweaking. CentOS
> was fine.
Your word in gods ears!
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSN LinuxMichi
0033/6/61925193 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
