On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 15:04 -0400, Andrew Malcolmson wrote: > On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 09:09:01AM -0400, Celejar wrote: > > Why not use Gmail (or something similar) for ML traffic? Free (as in > > beer), close to 3 GB of storage, free POP access. > > > > The real question is why Debian doesn't run a modern, user-friendly, > mailing list manager like Mailman, as does the entire rest of the open > source community. The user shouldn't be forced into kludgy solutions > because Debian alone continues to use a manager from ancient days.
Okay, why are you still using a 100 year old device for traveling around town or the country-side? Or if you a bi-cycling, a nearly 200 year old device? Just because other are doing it, doesn't mean it's better. Or are you going to jump off that bridge today? Or do those "designer drugs"? > If I have to use webmail for mailing list traffic, I loose the power and > convience of reading all my mail on my IMAP server in mutt. I use an IMAP server both locally and from my colo'd server, I could only use my local one after popping it all local from my colo'd machine. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Novell's Directory Services is a competitive product to Microsoft's Active Directory in much the same way that the Saturn V is a competitive product to those dinky little model rockets that kids light off down at the playfield. -- Thane Walkup -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
