On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:08:42 +0000 (UTC)
Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:13:41 -0400, Celejar wrote in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

[snip]

> > International law to which the US is a signatory? I violently reject the
> > notion that we're bound by international law to which we aren't.
> 
> ..in that case you become a war criminal.  As a civilian and non-
> combattant, you are entitled to vehemently voice your _opinion_ even if 
> it promotes war crime, because you as a civilian are entitled to your 
> ignorance and religious etc belief in these matters.  
> 
> ..now, as soon as you go _beyond_ _voicing_ your opinion, you must comply 
> with the full 4 Conventions.

Slip of the pen on my part; I meant 'vehemently'.

Celejar


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to