-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Liam O'Toole wrote: [snip]
>>. It seems people have blinders on today. He said he wanted to use the >> 32-bit version and he currently uses the 64-bit version. One can't >> downgrade a system from 64-bit to 32-bit easily. IMO, one would be >> better off re-installing. > > No, the OP stated that he was 'considering' the i386 port. My > suggestion offers him the possibility of avoiding the need for a > reinstall, if he is prepared to forego the delights of an i386 port. > I'll let the OP perform the cost/benefit analysis himself. Agreed, but he also said he needed wine and didn't want to do a chroot, which means he *needs* the 32-bit. It's not worth arguing over. Enough information has been given that he can now make an informed decision, whatever he decides to do. Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGAn4LiXBCVWpc5J4RAtfwAKDLHRnNPKZMb4RnvyJV7ov27ksFIACfcsfP WeHolnucS6MZUfsaUbLzkyY= =3V/d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
