Or if you run Sarge or Testing, grab the unstable deb-src and
compile away...
I friend of mine wants to run Dreamweaver, and I suggested wine. However he
had some problems (which I don't remember, and my friend is not here right
now). He runs Debian Unstable.
So you guys are saying that the .debs in winehq are not really suited to
Debian? I didn't know that.
So I wan't to compile from source.
In this case, what is the best way? to download the tarball from winehq or
to download the deb-src?
Maybe the deb-src is taylored to Ubuntu like the deb is. But maybe not
because it is only source anyway. I don't know.
Can someone enlighten me?
So, to sum it up, the reason that some upstream developers provide
>> Ubuntu but not Debian packages is because they either don't know about
>> tools like pbuilder or are just lazy.
>
> I fully agree. Now we just need to convince Mr. Richie of that. His
> e-mail address is: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I don't think we'll get very far, and I am not the one to do it, since I
> am not experienced enough with properly building Debian packages that I
> can engage in a technical discussion about it.
>
> I misquoted the first time, it doesn't say the package has changed, it
> said Debian changed.
>
> Registerd Linux user #443289 at http://counter.li.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF+m6+S9HxQb37XmcRArHEAJ9rNcqaJawqqEjr9J3tsMMXd0ARzgCgnVK6
MBxvPinn4yawrkueMRi2H+o=
=GZBc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Software is like sex: it is better when it is free.
