-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/12/07 12:43, Mike McCarty wrote: > Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: >> >> I personally am a fan of XFS. However, it is also possible to use ext3 >> on large partitions, as you point out. At work, I have a production >> server (running RHEL, unfortunately) which is serving up a 6 TB > > Why unfortunately? Do Linux fans have to hate other distros as well > as MS?
"unfortunately" != hatred. > >> filesystem. I took to reading up on ext3 and judiciously set things >> like the block size and some of the other filesystem parameters so that >> crash recovery would not take ages and so that performance would be a >> bit better. Of course, since Debian supports both XFS and JFS quite > > Care to share your insights? Or at least pointers where one may > obtain similar insights? Those of us who use ext3 would appreciate > any distillation of the information. > > Mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF9ZoJS9HxQb37XmcRAm9rAKCVoBA6u0v+neMDonpSUF5BxmbrOQCg1MmT pHVk6WEYNnVJnaxph2mJgmY= =HvYp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
