On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 01:23:37 -0700 Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Which is it? Spamassassin *will* take forever, but spamc/spamd > don't. Consider dman's spamassassin/exim integration, it performs > pretty well.
Well for me it is quite specific. spamc calling spamd from inside sa-exim
3.0 running under exim 4.2.
ii exim4-base 4.20-1 EXperimental Internal Mailer -- a Mail Trans
ii exim4-config 4.20-1 Debian configuration for exim4
ii exim4-daemon-h 4.20-1 Exim (v4) with extended features
ii sa-exim 3.0-1 Use Spam-Assassin at SMTP time with the Exim
ii spamassassin 2.55-2 Perl-based spam filter using text analysis
ii spamc 2.55-2 Client for perl-based spam filtering daemon
Clean messages seem to be taking longer than spam. Last 10 clean messages
as reported by spamd:
31.3 seconds,
31.1 seconds,
30.9 seconds,
31.0 seconds,
31.2 seconds,
31.8 seconds,
32.2 seconds,
1.2 seconds,
32.2 seconds,
1.0 seconds,
Last 10 spam messages:
31.2 seconds,
40.6 seconds,
1.4 seconds,
1.3 seconds,
0.7 seconds,
32.2 seconds,
30.9 seconds,
1.6 seconds,
31.7 seconds,
4.6 seconds,
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
| -- Lenny Nero - Strange Days
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
