Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:14:22AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: >> >> I would be a little bit less torqued about foreign aid and a lot more >> sympathetic to the cause if the aid we were exporting wasn't a better >> deal >> than what we keep. Did you know Iraq has national healthcare, and it's >> currently paid for by US tax dollars? >> > Iraq also does not have a functioning economy. Now, you might argue > that providing National healthcare is simply getting them addicted to > it. Which I think is true. However, I think that in this case it is > the right thing to do.
Probably because, you know, nearly everyone in a society needs healthcare and pays taxes, so national healthcare is the simplest strategy to cover the maximum number of people, no? > It would be nice if there were a better way, but I doubt there is. So since we're in agreement that collectively paying for healthcare is the way to go, why not introduce it here? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
