-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/26/07 00:03, Steve Lamb wrote: > Wulfy wrote: >> point is that TMI and Chernobyl were accidents. Sellafield isn't. >> Nuclear policy overrides safety when it's "convenient" - > > Question really is how many well run plants are out there. So far we > have, what, 3 plants named here as bad. Ok, out of how many? If it were 3 > for 3 that would be a problem. But 3 of 3000 would be a slightly different > picture, no?
Nuke plants are (probably) just like any other industrial plant: some well run, some not-so-well run. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF4oGCS9HxQb37XmcRAl6rAKCApn2nOlVoM5pwoX2FgtfnjvTzYgCfX37s vuR+HX1MEVjl+7e4CNEo/yA= =PFok -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
