-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/16/07 16:52, Mike McCarty wrote: > Ron Johnson wrote: >> On 02/16/07 16:22, Mike McCarty wrote: >>> Ron Johnson wrote: >>>> On 02/16/07 14:45, Mike McCarty wrote: [snip] >>> >>> Adding a few hundred megabytes of disc is not appealing to me, >> >> >> You really aren't a geek, are you? > > I really got laid off and don't have money to spend on
Ah, well, food+shelter trump all. > hardware. And even if I did, I wouldn't want to add > a lot of stuff to that machine. It's a dedicated machine. > I don't have "add-on-itis". > > Besides, just putting a bunch of cards together isn't my > idea of dealing with hardware, and the IBM PC is too > huge. I like a challenge. Too huge? Meaning it's too easy to add h/w? >>> especially since it can't be done. The smallest disc these >>> days is around 100 Gig. I wonder why it won't run on a 386? >> >> >> It? Slackware or the 100GB disk? > > Sorry. Slackware. The website states it requires a 486. OK. Yes, a couple of years ago, changes to glibc (for better C++ support) necessitated compiling it using 486 instructions. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFF1jvES9HxQb37XmcRAoqwAKCoFdxiUNXarnsk0z8fZey2DjPHlQCgvU/T qslo1eWJ/+Pg2Sj2MfQxV6c= =Ejzj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]