On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 11:14:00 -0500 Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 09:48 +0000, Liam O'Toole wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 01:15:53 -0500 > > Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > > On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 15:07 -0500, cga2000 wrote: > > > Now. when Etch goes stable, The Official and security lines need > > > to be changed to "stable" > > > > > > > Alternatively, you can change the lines to "etch" right now. Then > > you don't have to worry about the transition. > > Let us not go through that WHOLE ROUND of stuff again. Go back in the > archives and search your suggestion. You shall see a I was going from > Woody to Sarge to Etch to Sid (plus experimental on a few of those > upgrade) using the release "name" and the > stable/testing/unstable/experimental monikers as well. > > Yes, you could do that. But I don't want to get the ire of a few other > people up again, as I'd have to go back to working on something that > has already taken 40+ hours of my time to do a proper timeline and > about 90-Bamillion upgrades, all in Virtual Machines. I don't recall the debate you refer to. My suggestion above is what I'll be doing. What's best for you is for you to decide. -- Liam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
