On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 21:58:59 -0500 "Leonid Grinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, > > I know that I am entering this discussion somewhat late, but I wanted > to provide my two cents. [snip] > I started off with Debian. It was a great system, but it had some > problems, especially on laptops. The two biggest problems I found were > lack of ACPI (no hibernation or sleep) and lack of wireless support. > After installing Ubuntu, both of these problems were fixed. Debian Sid has ACPI support. Is Ubnutu's better or more reliable? Which wireless wasn't supported in Debian? > Ubuntu also seems to be easier to use because it has more GUI > frontends to programs. In general, I think that for people who either Which GUIs aren't available in Debian? > do not know how or do not want to deal with configuring (often > non-standard) hardware, Ubuntu is a better choice. However, for > sysadmins, especially on servers, Debian has always proven to me that > it is *much* better. > > Again, just my two cents. -- ssuds.sourceforge.net - Home of Ssuds and Ssudg, a Simple Sudoku Solver and Generator -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
