On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 05:26:12PM -0500, Daniel B. wrote: > Chris Bannister wrote: > >On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:42:22AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > >>Raju's point about employment with capitalone is entirely > >>different. CapitalOne is not (at least ostensibly) a web content > >>company. As such they can (IMO) be somehwat forgriven for having > >>non-compliant stuff on the web. That said, their web folks should be > >>slapped around a bit. > >> > >>make sense? > > > >http://linuxmafia.com/ > > What about it? (Is there any particular part of the > http://linuxmafia.com/ site you meant to be pointing to?)
Sorry, bit obscure. Andrew Sackville-West wrote: ... their web folks should be slapped around a bit. I suggested: http://linuxmafia.com/ -- Chris. ====== Don't forget to check that your /etc/apt/sources.lst entries point to etch and not testing, otherwise you may end up with a broken system once etch goes stable. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
