On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:03:01PM -0500 or thereabouts, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > News to me -- I've always used the package or application name. As an > > aside, I thought that new applications for Linux were encouraged to use > > Info for documentation ... > > Info is what the FSF is pushing. However, there's a dedicated community > of info-haters. Not that there are international standards about how to > do the things info was once used for (HTML and all that) there seems > little point in sticking to it.
OIC I keep getting confused on FSF and GNU priorities. I probably (as
you suggest) got that from someone advocating for FSF and didn't
understand the distinction at the time.
--
Regards
Stephen A.
Encrypted/Signed e-mail accepted (GPG or PGP) -- Key ID: 978BA045
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Let us endeavor so to live that when we come to die even the undertaker will be
sorry.
-- Mark Twain, "Pudd'nhead Wilson's Calendar"
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
