On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 12:07:59PM -0500, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:59:09AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 07:59:40PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > > > > > The document is now licensed under GPL v2. Please let me know if there is > > > anything else I can do. > > > > possibly the LGPL or the WxWindows leicence to make it easier for > > producers of other software to incorporate some or all of our > > documentation, possibly in file formats not yet conceived of. > > > > How would the GPL v2 prevent others from incorporating some or all of > our documentation, in any file format, as long as they include the GPL > v2 statement for all our stuff, even if what _they_ write is under a > different licence?
Some of their stuff might be executable code, and our stuff might be embedded in strings within a code library. -- hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
