On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:05:27 -0500 Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:46:47AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:16:58AM -0500, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > > > If we went with a non-wiki format then we need a home. > > > > A home on which to develop? or a home on which to publish? > > With a distributed revision control system, any site is, at least > > formally, the equal of any other -- no specific home is needed. > > With a wiki, the wiki site *is* home, with all the attendant > > uncertainty of what to do if the wiki goes defunct. > > > > We *do* need a site to point readers to, though, whether a wiki > > or some other. > > > > If we get a good document set up, I think that debian-doc or -www will > put up a link, wherever it is housed (homed?) for publishing. > > If the wiki page was one long page with chapters for each of our areas > of interest, we can wget and store the html that makes the document. > That way if the wiki goes defunct we still have the document, with its > licence statement, to put somewhere else. We could start a project on alioth. We can setup a repository, mailinglist, and also webpages (wiki or not). Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
