On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 11:18:32 +0000 Chris Lale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The wiki and the MediaWiki software are stable enough - it is the > Berlios server that is not always available. Not every Free software That's what I meant. > organisation will host a wiki sucessfully - eg SourceForge has a > better uptime but permissions will not allow user contributions, thus > defeating the whole point of a wiki. Also, the latest version of > MediaWiki requires PHP5 - again, not always provided. Still, there > are quite a few hosting services for Free software projects. > MediaWiki is the software behind Wikipedia and is built with Free > documentation in mind. It is mature, well-maintained and continuing > to be developed so it may be a good choice in the long run. If only wiki.d.o would use it. And also the color scheme of wiki.d.o is ... maybe it's just me, but I don't like it at all. Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
