On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 18:46:22 +0000 Chris Lale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 16:36:06 -0500 > > Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> If you changed the licence to be DFSG compliant, I would be happy > >> to contribute. Then again, if you did that, perhaps NewbieDoc's > >> wiki could be merged to Debian's. > >> > > > > GFDL is considered DFSG compliant as long as the document doesn't > > have unmodifiable parts: > > > > http://www.debian.org/News/2006/20060316 > > > > > > > > This is, in fact, the version of the GFDL used by the NewbieDOC > project since 2001. > > It is easy enough specifically to dual-licence an article (GFDL + > GPL). Doing this has made it possible for some of the NewbieDOC > content to be included in the Debian Reference (which requires GPL). > It would be very difficult to re-licence all the work in either > NewbieDOC or Debian Reference - tracing all the contributors (past > and present) and obtaining permission would be very difficult. How can I dual-licence my 'note' (if necessary), the one about masquerading? Regards, Andrei -- If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. (Albert Einstein) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
