On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 22:48 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 03:04:46PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote: > > You should take a look at my sources.list > > > > http://www.gregfolkert.net/files/sources.list > > [qoute from above link] > # COMMENTS: > # Do not forget to put in /etc/apt/apt.conf > # > # APT::Default-Release "<version>"; > # APT::Cache-Limit 18000000; > # > # Else you'll never be able to parse all of these > # > # version can be: woody, sarge, etch, sid, > # oldstable, stable, testing, > # unstable or experimental > # > [/qoute] > > The APT-HOWTO doesn't mention code-names for the 'Default-Release' > option and my experiments suggest they don't work at all.
Hmm, unless you have the the sources labeled as them... IOW like this: ## Old Stable - Debian (currently Woody) #deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian woody main contrib non-free #deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian woody main contrib non-free ## Stable - Debian (currently Sarge) #deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian sarge main contrib non-free #deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian sarge main contrib non-free ## Testing - Debian (currently Etch) #deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian etch main contrib non-free #deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian etch main contrib non-free ## Unstable - Debian (always SID, or Still In Developement) #deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free #deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free Then they do work. And I just tested it here on the very machine I am typing from... and it does work with the release labels. Perhaps I should make a second sources.list this way. To remove any confusion. -- greg, [EMAIL PROTECTED] The technology that is Stronger, better, faster: Linux
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
