>> Regulations prevent distribution = non-free
> True, it's non-free by Debian standards. But I still would like to make
> a distinction between blatantly non-free software, like the w32codecs,
> and stuff licensed as free software, like libdvdcss.
Agreed. It would be good to distinguish between those packages that are
non-free because the author dosn't want to free it, from those packages that
are non-free despite the best effort of the author.
Stefan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
