On 2006-12-12 09:21:47 +0900, Miles Bader wrote: > Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I wonder why emacs 22 isn't in stable, since it works better than > > emacs 21 (see bug 133937 in particular, I've never had such a problem > > with emacs 22). > > I suppose 'cause it isn't released yet...
There are other packages corresponding to software that has not been released (e.g. based on CVS) and are in stable, e.g. cedet-common 1:1.0beta3b-1.1 stable cl-htmlgen 1.2.42+cvs.2005.02.21 stable grub 0.95+cvs20040624-17sarge1 stable zsh-beta 4.3.0-dev-1+20050424-1 stable > Personally I think it would be better to include an unreleased Emacs 22 > in etch, as it's hugely better than the released Emacs 21 (and hey > they've got that great new "~" syntax in version numbers to use :-). Is there a way to have this changed or it is too late for Etch? -- Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
