On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 04:11:21PM +0800, Jeff Zhang wrote:
> which fs system (jfs, xfs or future ext4) will perform better for desktop
> usage under occasional power failure circumstance? like recover from power
> failure and fragment after long time run.
> thanks in advance!
I ran into this. I started with ext2 (the standard) which got corrupted
and lost files with power failure. Went to ext3 (ext2 + journal) which
was better but __silently__ would lose files. Went to Reiserfs which
would get corrupted by reiserfsck. Went to JFS and no more problems.
There was a discussion here a short time ago; try a google search
site:lists.debian.org JFS
My suggestion is to use JFS for everything (and keep good backups).
Good luck.
Doug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
